Back to blog

Learning Science: Quests vs Textbooks and Tests

By Zach Lahn on March 16, 2022

Parents tend to crave the kind of learning that feels familiar to them – especially when it comes to “science.”

A recent conversation with a parent best describes why at Wonder, our science learning comes in the form of quests with real world problems to solve rather than textbooks and written tests:

Parent: I think one thing I am still struggling with is accepting the fact that Wonders really don’t need to spend years memorizing science facts and repeating ‘classic’ experiments and should be able to go straight to the juicy bit of science – tackling real world problems and coming up with solutions. I am quite jealous, to be honest! I’m still constantly having to remind myself not to impose my own experiences on their learning…

Response: The history and heroes of science are deeply important, as are the experiments of old; however, the way to encourage heroes to devour “learning to know” [ie, facts] is to give them a “learning to do” [ie, hands-on] real world challenge that matters to their hero’s journeys, and requires courage, scientific curiosity and grit to complete. In other words, we want to provide a rich soil for the next Richard Feynman, who would have been bored to tears by a traditional science course. At Wonder, I have never heard the words, “Science is boring.” Now that I think about it, the word “boring” is not a part of our language even amongst our staff. One of my favorite sentences from one of our guides was: “In all the years I’ve worked at Wonder I have never once looked at the clock wishing time would go by faster.” When you are on a journey that matters, learning is a tough, gripping, exciting and necessary part of life. Reading textbooks is fine. Although there is simply so much more.

[Blogs or portion of blogs may be adapted from the blog of our partner school founder and advisor, Laura Sandefer.]